Thursday, March 10, 2011
lol...
B)
You know what we need to do if you pick me? Well, we're going raid and find King Louis. We'll charge into his castle with a rage level of 5000+. We'll come in with fiery madness and teach that spineless coward who really owns the country. Locke said that leaders could be overthrown by the citizens if proved unworthy. It is the citizens who decide who governs them. Following his words, we are able to overthrow King Louis. Now, once we overthrow him, I'll become your new leader. First we will all have an equal chance of voting based on the number of people in each esate. For example, perhaps the first higher esates will have 300 votes and the bottom class would have 600 in total. Therefore, we would have all an equal chance to represent ourselves.
C) King Louis was a very weak leader of France. Instead of indulging in studies and learning about economics he was often found outside hunting and doing outdoor activities. A leader requires a vast knowledge of politics, economics, and various subjects. King Louis was dissatisfied with all of them and rather spend time outside lallygagging.
In yahoo answers, I quote, "
D)
I AM A POLAR BEAR. Because I am cute and cuddly. And you can hug me because I'm fuzzy. But if you touch my babies, I claw your face off.
French Revolution
explain each picture
Overpowering wealthy class and they only consist of 3% of population and 97% is the poor with only 1/3 of say in voting.
France has fallen into a fearing time where the people are scared about the making of a new government due to their uncontrolled and chaotic ways. This causes many suicides and loss of hope.
I plan to create an organized structured government where the French can be happy in their own land and advance as a country with a new and improved leader,me.
Maximilien Robespierre was a positive leader who followed John Lockes theory of "all men are naturally good" Although his ideas were good he was very positive he reflected them horribly by cutting the heads of the people who disagreed with him. Like John Locke says "Men are all good and do not need a structure to lead their people." I believe if you are a follower of this theory you wouldn't need a leader. One thing is to agree and grow from this and the other is to lead from it its contradicting itself. I would allow the people to have some say into their life plans and trust that they are good.
French Revolution
~People were being killed or punished for no reason
Solutions
~To make high levels have to pay taxes also
~Make all levels equal so no one is treated unfairly
~Find better leaders
Change
The change I would make would be to have a better person in government to lead the people fairly. Also i would make the "higher" class pay taxes more than the middle class, because it would even out the money they each receive. The wealthier people make more money, doesn't make them better though. They should have to pay taxes just like everyone else.
Maximilien Robespierre
Maximilien Robespierre was one of the leaders during the French Revolution. He wasn't what you would call a good leader. He was very controlling and only like the way he though, he didn't care what anyone else had to say. He was also part of the Jacobin political party, which believed strongly in the "Reign of Terror".
Quote
"Terror is only justice: prompt, severe and inflexible; it is then an emanation of virtue; it is less a distinct principle than a natural consequence of the general principle of democracy, applied to the most pressing wants of the country."
When Maximilien said this, what he was trying to say was that the consequence should not just be something that is "natural" or happens every time, it should be something that is wanted by the citizens of the town or people of higher power.
Interesting Fact
Maximilian had the nickname incorruptible when he was leader. He believed so strongly in his own opinion that when people came to him with their ideas he wouldn't even budge to consider them.
I am a Better Leader
Maximilian did not care about anyone besides himself and his own ideas. I actually listen to what people have to say, but do what's best for everyone. Not just what's for me or for certain people. Also he punishes people for doing absolutely nothing wrong. He would kill someone if he just didn't like the way they looked. I would only punish someone when the consequence was neccisary. Maximilian was not a good leader. He was unfair and cruel and that's why I would be a better leader than him.
-31
As we all know, France has been in an unstable and very chaotic period for a long time now. Some problems include the lack of power in decisions the lowest estate has. Their representation is not equal to the higher estates. A second problem is that the government is trying to change things by making a "declaration of the rights of man and of the citizen". The problem with that is the declaration only protects the right of adult men, not women.
To solve these solutions I would have the lowest estate have MORE representation because they are 97% of the people who make up France! To do that, I will have the lowest estate have 600 people representing them, while the upper two estates with 300 people each. This will make voting in important decisions four our country ultimately equal.
A change I will make in the government is how they make use of the guillotine. People are dying here, there, and everywhere! It is not fair to trial a random citizen and kill them because you want to with the guillotine! My idea of giving everyone a fair chance in life is supported by John Locke. He thinks people are naturally good and not selfish. Saying that, nobody should be killed without any reason or without a fair chance in trial.
King Louis XVI was born in the King of Versailles, out of the seven children in his family. He was a smart child and was interested in locksmithing beginning at an early age. A fun fact about King Louis XVI was that he had a difficult childhood., including being neglected for his older brother (died at age 9) who was said to be bright and handsome. He took the big job as king in 1774, he wasn't even 20 years old yet! When I mean big job, I mean that he had many responsibilities. One including the government being in huge debt. He reigned for 19 years, but was executed in 1793 for many reasons, one including indecisiveness.
However, before King Louis XVI was executed he said ""I will never consent to the plundering of my clergy and my nobles. Fine actions had earned them their privileges; the king of France must conserve those privileges for them." This is saying that the upper class, including nobles and religious leaders, deserve to be where they are and what privileges they have. He must do everything in his power to protect their rights. What this says about him is that because the upper estates have a bigger voice in government, he will listen to them. He is an easily persuaded man who is very indecisive and won't know what to do for our country and it's future.
I should be the leader of France because I am an overall open-minded person. I have determination and hope that our country's military and economy will thrive and succeed. Also, I would be a fair leader, hearing opinions and strategies from all three estates. But why would I be a greater leader than the great King Louis XVI, it's because of my firmness. I know what the country wants and what I want, therefore mixing the two and having a definite solution. Unlike him, I would decide not necessarily quickly, but wisely.
I would make a great leader because I am open minded. I am open to new ideas suggested by the common people to help the common people. Although hearing people out, staying firm and making decisions based on partly what I want too would be something I'd do.
I would also make a great leader because I have hope for France. I know things can get rough and many people won't believe in a more positive future for us, but I know I can help France for the better.
French Revolution
I, April Sunid, should be crowned as leader of France. I will evenly distribute liberties and freedoms amongst the people, and remove estates. It will be a civil and safe place to start your life regardless of how much money you have. With Louis XVI being France's useless king, he's caused 97% of people to have little to no money. I will ensure that everyone makes a decent amount of money, and hopefully no one will have to touch the poverty line. To do this, I'll make sure all children get sent to school, and all families will find some sort of job.
Unlike the gruesome and harsh Maximillien Robespierre, I will bring only the wrongful people to justice. Harsh punishment to people just because they don't agree with me gives my power no right to execute them. I will keep all the rightful people safe, and the criminals will be punished. Like Thomas Hobbes, I believe people are naturally bad, and the naturally bad, they should be punished for their wrongdoings.
Robespierre one said, "The king must die so that the country can live." He means that he wants to take over so he can rule the way he wants. He would be the leader that would let the country "live," by forcing them to do as he wants. I think he's an idiot of a ruler because he tried to shoot himself prior to his execution but failed. He spent his last hours with much of his jaw hanging off. tr













I am like the Statue of Libery because I am a beacon of hope for the future of France. I will lead the way to a new era of prosperity.
