The three estates were very critical, and didn't give any of the lower class people rights. This is very unfair and just because you are poor, doesn't mean you should be treated that way. I would change this law, and not allow people to discriminate against someone because of their social class, and those that weren't born into a very wealthy living space, would be able to work up to that position, and actually be somebody in life, their rights would not be restricted.

Louis XVI. Of course it is fair to give everyone a chance to have some power, but when we receive a leader like this, he/she will not be in the position for long. France and its people cannot afford a bad leader, we as people deserve much more than being cheated for money. So if you chose me to become a leader, I would want the best for the people, because I count as a citizen also, and if i destroy my country, it would not only largely effect the people, but it will effect me and as well as my family, which proves i will treat the people right.

A change that I would make in the government would be that I would change ruling to a democracy form. I believe in everyone having a say in what is being chosen for the ALL, the ALL includes the people, so why not allow the people to have a say??? Exactly they should have a say, which is why I want a democracy, so the people have power as well, not just the supreme ruler. Locke supports this, because he as well believed in the people, and trusted that they would make right decisions, and should be able to have a say.

Maximilien Robespierre was a very powerful leader, who always thought he was right. When someone would disagree with him, he would give them punishment. Ultimately he wasn't really loved by that many.
"Terror is Justified", this is what Robespierre ruled by, he believed that scaring people and hurting them was okay. When someone disagreed with him he believed it was the right thing to do, so he just killed them. Even if someone didn't do anything and he didn't like them, he would kill them, no questions asked.
Robespierre was a very influential leader in the Jacobin club. I believe this was because he liked them, but he didn't treat others in this manner.
I am a better leader than Robespierre because all he pretty much cared about was himself, money, and the Jacobin's. People could do as little as walking on the street, minding their own business, and would get arrested, just because Robespierre didn't like him/her. Just because I may dislike someone I wouldn't arrest them for that reason. I would listen to the people and and take in what they have to say, and actually base my rules on them. People deserve power, and with me as a leader, they will be given that power.
Obama is who i would be, he is strong, listens to the people and and takes into consideration of what they say.
I would be MLK, what was best for the people and wanted FREEDOM. This is who I admire.